Cameron's Speech Rebuked By Fiscal Watchdog

David Cameron has been rebuked by the Office for Budget Responsibility about the impact of his Government's austerity measures on economic growth.

In a high-profile speech on Thursday, the Prime Minister said the OBR was "absolutely clear that the deficit reduction plan is not responsible" for depressed growth, adding "in fact, quite the opposite".

But the head of the independent fiscal watchdog has written to Mr Cameron saying he misrepresented its position.

Chairman Robert Chote wrote to Number 10, disputing the claims.

He insisted that it believed there was a short-term effect and that "fiscal consolidation measures have reduced economic growth over the past couple of years".

The strong retort from the watchdog came in response to a passage from the Prime Minister's speech which he used to insist there was "no alternative" to the Government's strategy.

"There's not some choice between dealing with our debts and planning for growth," he said.

"As the independent Office for Budget Responsibility has made clear growth has been depressed by the financial crisis, the problems in the eurozone and a 60% rise in oil prices between August 2010 and April 2011.

"They are absolutely clear that the deficit reduction plan is not responsible. In fact, quite the opposite."

But the OBR published a letter sent to Number 10 on Friday by Mr Chote in which he took exception to the claims.

"For the avoidance of doubt, I think it is important to point out that every forecast published by the OBR since the June 2010 Budget has incorporated the widely-held assumption that tax increases and spending cuts reduce economic growth in the short term."

He added that an impact of "external inflation shocks, deteriorating export markets and financial sector and eurozone difficulties were more likely explanations" than incorrect multipliers for the reason growth was even weaker that initially forecast.

A Downing Street spokesman said: "The OBR has today again highlighted external inflation shocks, the eurozone and financial sector difficulties as the reasons why their forecasts have come in lower than expected.

"That is precisely the point the Prime Minister was underlining."

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

US Boom: Jobs Jump By 236,000 In February

The number of people hired in the United States by non-farm employers jumped by 236,000 in February, exceeding expectations.

The unemployment rate also dropped to 7.7% from 7.9% in January, the lowest level since December 2008.

The Obama administration said it is evidence that the economic recovery is "gaining traction".

New jobs have averaged more than 200,000 per month since November last year.

Wages have increased and the gains were broad-based, led by the best construction hiring in six years.

New construction jobs continue to build up the US economy

But there was one negative detail in the government's February employment report.

Employers added fewer jobs in January than first estimated.

Job gains were lowered to 119,000 from an initially reported 157,000.

However, December hiring was a little better than first thought, with 219,000 jobs added instead of 196,000.

The upbeat figures saw a strengthening of the dollar, with Sterling sliding beneath the $1.49 figure.

Many economists expected hiring to fall in early 2013 largely due to the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the US budget, higher tax rates and looming federal spending cuts that took effect in March.

Yet the latest jobs report indicates job creation is speeding up.

However, early 2011 and 2012 also saw hiring jumps only to see the figures die back as the year went on.

White House economist Alan Krueger noted in a statement that the new unemployment rate was measured before $85bn (£56bn) in automatic budget cuts started taking effect.

The administration has warned that the cuts could have a negative impact on employment and economic growth.

It is urging Congress to move toward a "sustainable federal budget" by closing tax loopholes, enacting entitlement reforms and cutting spending.

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

Barclays Chief Jenkins Hints At Jobs Axe

By Mark Kleinman, City Editor

The chief executive of Barclays has suggested that the growing automation of banking services could result in tens of thousands of jobs disappearing from its workforce during the next decade.

I have learned that during meetings with leading shareholders following Barclays' annual results last month, Antony Jenkins said that he envisaged a future in which the bank employed as few as 100,000 people. Barclays currently employs approximately 140,000 staff.

Mr Jenkins is understood to have discussed during the investor meetings the objective of Barclays becoming a self service-oriented company which allows its remaining staff to focus on delivering "added value" to customers and clients across its retail, investment and wealth management operations.

The suggestion by Mr Jenkins could stoke concerns that he is planning a vast redundancy programme, although a Barclays insider insisted that Mr Jenkins had not been setting a formal target for job cuts and that his comments should be regarded as "blue-sky thinking about the long-term future".

"He was talking about how the bank needs to be more efficient in general terms," a person close to Mr Jenkins said. "It's about how we do the same or more with a smaller headcount, but there is no specificity about how much smaller."

Antony Jenkins replaced Bob Diamond as chief executive last year

Even so, the reference to such a potentially dramatic reduction in the size of Barclays' workforce is inflammatory, given Mr Jenkins' effort to position it as the 'Go-To' bank for stakeholders. Mr Jenkins took over as chief executive in the wake of the Libor-rigging scandal that saw Barclays fined £291m by regulators in the UK and US.

His comments come as banks face growing pressure from investors to make themselves more efficient amid pressure from regulators to hold more capital. The major UK-based banks have consistently underperformed in terms of delivering returns to investors since the financial crisis because of their bloated cost bases, and have been under pressure to reduce bonus pools in order to deliver more capital to shareholders.

Barclays has more than 1,650 branches in Britain, employing tens of thousands of people. Achieving job reductions on the scale implied by Mr Jenkins during his recent meetings would, insiders said, principally involve Barclays' investment bank's back office as well as the closure of some branches both in the bank's home market and overseas, although a spokesman said that such actions were not on the bank's immediate agenda.

Any large-scale closure of UK branches would entail further bad news for high streets ravaged by the collapse of a string of prominent retailers.

Mr Jenkins has already set out a concrete cost reduction programme at Barclays, which will involve £1.7bn being eradicated from the bank's cost-base by 2015. 3700 jobs will be axed as part of the plan to address costs, which the Barclays chief executive referred to last month as a "strategic battleground".

Many of the proposed job cuts are taking place within Barclays' investment banking arm, with the bulk of the rest focused on its retail banking operations in troubled Eurozone countries such as Italy and Spain.

Accompanying last month's full-year results, in which Barclays reported a profit of £246m, Mr Jenkins gave a presentation about the future of the bank in which he referred to the "21st Century industrialisation" of the industry.

The "large-scale focused automation of core processes", "globalisation of processes [and] reduced real-estate footprint" and "customer and client-centric self-service via best-in-class digital and mobile" were all signalled by the Barclays chief in his presentation.

Barclays has been a pioneer in internet and mobile-based banking and payment services, including through its money-transfer app, Ping-It, which has been hugely popular as customers increasingly switch to digital channels.

One investor said Mr Jenkins' presentation underlined his determination to overhaul Barclays in a more radical way than even that attempted by Bob Diamond, his predecessor.

Barclays declined to comment on Mr Jenkins' remarks.

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

PM: We'll Come Through If We Hold Firm

Cameron Firm On Tough Resolutions

Updated: 4:54pm UK, Thursday 07 March 2013

By Jon Craig, Chief Political Correspondent, in Keighley

David Cameron came to Bronte country to talk about human emotions … or rather the impact on them of these tough economic times.

"I know things are tough right now," he said at the beginning of his big speech on the economy in a smart, modern workshop at the Cinetic Landis factory, heading up hill out of Keighley towards the moors.

"Families are struggling with the bills at the end of the month. Some are just a pay cheque away from going into the red. Parents are worried about what the future holds for their children."

Spoken with Bronte-like passion.

It was as if he wanted to answer straightaway the criticism of his opponents - and some Conservative MPs - that he's a rich, posh boy who doesn't understand the hardship facing ordinary families.

But after the "I feel your pain" opening, he ended his speech with a defiant message on the economy, rejecting calls for a U-turn on spending cuts and repeating Margaret Thatcher's famous slogan: "There is no alternative."

"This month's Budget will be about sticking to the course," said the Prime Minister. "Because there is no alternative that will secure our country's future."

Aah, but there is, his critics are arguing. And those critics now include Vince Cable, according to Labour, after his New Statesman article calling for more borrowing to fund more capital spending.

But David Cameron wasn't having any of that.

After he said in his speech that he was prepared to "roll up his sleeves and fight" opponents of various Government initiatives like the HS2 rail project, I asked him in his Q&A if he would do the same with his Business Secretary.

No need, he said, somewhat unconvincingly. "He agrees with the Government's policy," he said. "The article he wrote in the New Statesman was cleared and approved by the Treasury."

Really? By Danny Alexander, perhaps, but not George Osborne, I fancy.

Vince Cable's intervention rather took the gloss off the PM's speech in the big, shiny workshop in this highly impressive machine tools factory, where they're working seven days a week to meet their export demands from China and other countries.

The Prime Minister was clearly intending, less than a fortnight before the Budget, to give a few pointers to the Chancellor's statement on March 20. There would be more help for people to get mortgages, he hinted, and possibly more help for motorists hit by rising fuel bills.

He described himself as a "low tax Conservative" and said the only way to cut taxes was to cut the deficit. Labour, he said, believed there was a "magic money tree". From branding Ed Miliband a "croupier in the casino" at PMQs to a "magic money tree". Colourful!

But the main thrust of his defiant message came at the end of his speech, when he concluded by insisting the Government would "stick to the course" because it was about "doing the right thing".

Why? Because, he said, if there were to be good jobs, good public services and money to look after people in their old age, the deficit had to be cut and there must be no more "squandering billions on welfare for people who could work".

This speech came just a few days after Mr Cameron pledged in a Sunday Telegraph article that there would be no "lurch to the Right".

And yet here he was repeating Mrs Thatcher's "There is no alternative" slogan.

But then Margaret Thatcher has always been David Cameron's heroine, in true Wuthering Heights style.

Was Maggie Catherine Earnshaw to Dave's Heathcliffe, I wonder? No, it was Gordon Brown who was likened to the brooding Heathcliffe.

Wait a minute, the PM also talked here about "tough choices", a Tony Blair phrase.

Perhaps Dave is Jane Eyre to Blair's Mr Rochester? No, Frank Field compared Gordon Brown to him too.

Many Tory MPs see the Prime Minister as a flawed hero these days, however.

No wonder he only stayed in Bronte country for about an hour and a half.

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

EasyJet: Budget Airline Joins FTSE 100

Budget airline easyJet has been promoted to the FTSE 100 Index after a record run for its share price.

The Luton-based firm is the London market's 82nd largest company and with a value of £4bn is large enough to earn a place among the ranks of blue-chip companies in the latest quarterly review of FTSE indices.

Its shares closed at a record high of 1017p on Friday, having stood at just under 400p when Carolyn McCall took over as chief executive in July 2010.

The company, which joined the stock market in 2000, has benefited from an improved operational performance and the launch of allocated seating, which helped it attract 10 million business passengers last year.

EasyJet has consistently beaten City expectations for profits but a long-running war of words with founder and major shareholder Sir Stelios Haji Ioannou has overshadowed some of its recent success.

Sir Stelios, whose family holds around 36% of the company's shares, has been unhappy at plans to place a large order for a fleet of more fuel-efficient aircraft.

At its recent annual meeting, the entrepreneur was unsuccessful in a vote against the company's remuneration report and re-election of Sir Mike Rake as chairman.

Sir Mike has already said he will leave the company in the summer because easyJet's promotion to the FTSE 100 Index will conflict with his role as chairman of another blue-chip company, BT Group.

The FTSE 100 is the index of the biggest firms listed in London.

It will be the first time that Easyjet has made it into the blue-chip index.

The London Stock Exchange is also returning to the FTSE 100 after a nearly three-year absence.

The changes will take effect from the start of trading on Monday March 18.

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

RBS Apology As Customers Hit By New IT Glitch

RBS, NatWest and Ulster Bank have apologised after many customers were unable to log in to their accounts or withdraw cash.

The technical problems come less than a year after they were hit by a computer meltdown that left millions of people unable to access their money.

"We are disappointed that our customers have faced disruption to banking services for a period this evening, and apologise for that," the banks said in a message on Twitter.

The banks said their systems were back to normal around three hours after they admitted there was a problem.

Customers said they had difficulties using cash machines or logging into online banking, while others complained their cards had been declined.

Steve Ireland, who lives in London, told Sky News he discovered the problem when he tried to pay with his card at a supermarket.

RBS boss Stephen Hester had to apologise for a glitch last June

"I was out shopping after a night out with my partner to celebrate a birthday," he said. "I went into a very big chain supermarket and got to the cash desk with all my shopping, only to be told the card was declined.

"It was a really bad experience and very embarrassing. You get evil looks from the cashier when you can't pay."

Stuart Keel, from Cornwall, said he tried to use a cash machine but it was not working.

"We went to the supermarket thinking we could use our cards in there, no problem," he said.

"While we were walking around I was using my NatWest (smartphone) app and it wasn't working at all."

He said his card was then declined at the checkout.

"I thought, 'There's something not right here'," he added.

In June last year, millions of people were affected when a software update failed at the banks.

Customers were unable to view up-to-date balances, while payments such as direct debits for bills were not made and some wages were not received.

Stephen Hester, the chief executive of the banks' parent company RBS Group, which is 80% state-owned, was forced to apologise for the problems at the time and £100m was put aside to compensate customers.

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

Dow Industrial Average Closes At All-Time High

By Sky News US Team, in New York

The Dow Jones industrial average has closed at an all-time high, powered by China's strong economic growth targets and a jump in European retail sales

It settled at 14,253.77 points, up 125.95 points, or 0.9%, surpassing its previous record high of 14,198 set on October 11, 2007.

The index is up nearly 9% this year, capping a remarkable comeback. The Dow has more than doubled since hitting a 12-year low in March 2009.

The Standard & Poor's 500 index rose 14 points, or 1%, to 1,539. The S&P also is within striking distance of its record close of 1,565.

The Nasdaq gained 42 points, or 1.3%, to 3,224.

Three stocks rose for every one that fell on the New York Stock Exchange. Volume was light at 3.3 billion shares.

Stocks have rallied this year on optimism that the US housing market is recovering and companies are slowly starting to hire again. Strong corporate earnings have also helped increase demand.

The market has also benefited from economic stimulus from the Federal Reserve and other global central banks.

The US central bank is buying $85bn each month in Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities to keep long-term interest rates very low.

Home prices rose 9.7% in January from a year ago and had the biggest gain since April 2006, according to data released by CoreLogic.

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

CPP In Talks Over Debt-For-Equity Swap

By By Mark Kleinman, City Editor

One of Britain's biggest providers of identity theft insurance is in talks about a financial restructuring that could involve its lenders taking a significant stake in the company.

I have learnt that CPP Group is holding discussions about a possible debt-for-equity swap in an attempt to safeguard its future following a mis-selling scandal that saw it hit with a multimillion pound fine by the City regulator.

The talks come ahead of a deadline at the end of this month for CPP to secure new terms with its creditors.

Under one scenario being negotiated with its lenders, which are led by Barclays, Royal Bank of Scotland and Santander UK, the three banks would exchange debt for an undisclosed proportion of CPP's shares.

Another proposal would involve Hamish Ogston, the entrepreneur who founded CPP and floated it on the stock market in 2010, participating in the refinancing by injecting new funds into the company. Mr Ogston already owns a 57% stake in CPP and could emerge from the refinancing discussions with a larger shareholding, according to insiders.

Among the issues which is at the centre of the conversations is whether any new shares held by Mr Ogston or any other new investor would rank alongside those of the company's existing shareholders. Other business partners of CPP, such as HSBC, could also wind up with an equity stake in the credit card insurer.

Mr Ogston's stake in CPP was worth about £16.5m at Tuesday's closing share price of 17.25p. The company's share price has slumped by more than 80% during the last 12 months.

The banks and CPP have been in talks about the restructuring for more than six months. People close to CPP said that unless a solvent solution could be achieved through a scheme of arrangement that would ring-fence compensation for customers, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme was likely to be forced to step in.

Such an outcome would anger industry members which were not responsible for selling CPP's products. The company markets itself as a "life assistance" provider which sells cover for mobile phone theft, offers access to airport lounges and provides a secure key storage service.

"There is an urgency about the talks which reflects the fact that CPP's debt facilities mature at the end of March," said one person involved in the talks.

Although modest by comparison with the mis-selling of payment protection insurance (PPI) and interest rate hedging products, the CPP episode is likely to cost the company and its banking partners as much as £200m.

CPP, which stands for Card Protection Plan, was fined £10.5m by the Financial Services Authority for selling insurance to hundreds of thousands of customers who were already covered by existing policies.

In December, the company said in a statement to the Stock Exchange that it remained in talks with the FSA and its business partners about the structure for offering compensation.

"These discussions continue to include consideration of the use of a solvent Scheme of Arrangement as a vehicle for providing redress. The amount of redress which will require to be paid to customers is uncertain. The Group expects to materially increase the provision it has made for customer redress and associated costs in light of current estimates."

CPP, which employs about 1,000 people at its headquarters in York, sold a relatively small proportion of its policies directly to consumers. The vast majority were sold by bank,s which acted as 'introducers' and which will have to fork out for the bulk of the eventual compensation bill.

The board of CPP has also considered selling the whole company as part of its review of options to preserve its future. However, discussions about a takeover by the US company Affinion Group ended without agreement in November.

Last month, CPP confirmed that RBS had notified it that the bank would not renew its contract for providing mobile phone insurance, while restrictions imposed by the FSA will have an adverse impact on CPP's revenues.

A CPP spokesman declined to comment on Tuesday.

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

Funding For Lending Credit Cut Sharply

British lenders taking part in a Bank of England scheme to boost firms' and households' access to credit cut lending sharply in the last three months, official statistics have revealed.

The lower than expected Funding for Lending Scheme (FLS) figures have dampened hopes that the project could help revive economic growth.

The BoE announced the scheme jointly with the Government in June 2012, as a way to unblock a credit log-jam which some economists say is a big factor behind Britain's weak economic recovery.

Banks and building societies cut lending by a net £2.425bn between October and December.

The figure compares to an increase of around £1bn in the first months of the FLS's operation.

Total net lending by banks and building societies taking part in the scheme - which includes all major British lenders apart from HSBC - is now down by £1.502bn since June 30.

The bank said that the scheme's benefits will not be fully clear until later in 2013.

"I would not expect to see a return to rising aggregate quantities until we start getting data for 2013 at the earliest," the bank's Paul Fisher said.

Taxpayer-backed lenders Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group saw lending fall, despite drawing money from the scheme.

Lloyds has drawn £3bn so far, but lending fell by £3.1bn last quarter, while RBS has taken £750m, but its lending still fell by £1.7bn.

Prime Minister David Cameron's official spokesman said that the Government and the BoE had always made clear that it would take some time before the impact of the Funding for Lending scheme was felt, and that it was not expected as early as the fourth quarter of 2012.

"I think the Bank of England at the time of the launch of the policy was clear that it would take some time for the impact of the policy to be fully felt," the spokesman said.

"The most recent figures for lending in the economy, for January - the first month of Q1 2013 (the first quarter of 2013) - show that lending to the economy increased in January.

"I think we are also seeing the impact of the Funding for Lending scheme through lower borrowing costs. I think we are seeing evidence of the policy having a clear impact."

But shadow chancellor Ed Balls said: "These are deeply disappointing figures. Net lending is actually down since the Funding for Lending scheme started and down by £2.4bn in the final three months of 2012.

"And the Bank of England's own figures show that net lending to businesses fell by £4.5bn in the last quarter."

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

New FSA Rules Prompt Internet Bank Rethink

By Mark Kleinman, City Editor

A new retail bank which has been struggling to secure funding and regulatory approval for more than three years has restarted talks with potential investors, buoyed by new rules governing start-up lenders.

I have learnt that Home & Savings Bank, which has been seeking as much as £250m of external capital since 2009, has in recent weeks resumed canvassing private equity firms, hedge funds and wealthy individuals about backing its launch plans.

The company, which would be a telephone and internet-based lender, is the brainchild of a group of former bank executives and Martin Finegold, the boss of Cambridge Place Asset Management, a London-based hedge fund.

People familiar with Home & Savings Bank's business plan said it had scaled back its ambitions and was now aiming to raise between £100m and £150m.

The nascent bank's management team includes Stuart Sinclair, former head of Tesco Personal Finance, and Peter Birch, one-time head of Abbey National.

Its new fundraising objective has been galvanised by the imminent publication of guidelines by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), which will allow banking start-ups to operate with much less capital than established high street rivals.

Mr Finegold's fund has already burned through millions of pounds in costs incurred by the development of Home & Savings Bank.

Over a three-year period it has held talks with dozens of possible investors, including Advent International and Blackstone, the buyout firms, and Magnetar Financial, the hedge fund. Home & Savings Bank also tried to pursue a stock market flotation but without success.

All of those discussions proved fruitless amid what many analysts see as a vicious circle hindering such embryonic projects: regulators will not approve new lenders until they have sufficient capital, while investors are reluctant to commit capital when there is uncertainty about whether a bank will receive regulatory approval.

Since the financial crisis a number of new retail banks have launched in Britain, the most prominent of which has been Metro Bank. Despite its public relations success, however, even it has made only modest competitive in-roads against the likes of Barclays, Lloyds Banking Group and Royal Bank of Scotland.

Last month, Sky News revealed that talks over the FSA reforms were being held up by demands from the Treasury to accelerate further the timetable for authorising new banks.

A spokesman for Home & Savings Bank declined to comment.

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

HSBC Boss Gulliver In Line For £2m Bonus

By Mark Kleinman, City Editor

HSBC is to award its chief executive a bonus of just under £2m for 2012 following a year of successful strategic action to overhaul the bank but which was marred by a £1.2bn fine for violating US money-laundering laws.

I have learned that HSBC, Britain's biggest lender by market capitalisation, will announce on Monday alongside its full-year results that Stuart Gulliver has been awarded the bonus as part of a multimillion pound pay package.

Mr Gulliver intends to accept the award, according to HSBC insiders. His bonus will be deferred and subject to clawback, and he will not be able to cash it in until he retires from or leaves HSBC.

As part of an effort to demonstrate greater transparency over the way it rewards top executives, HSBC will for the first time publish a single figure for the aggregate pay and benefits packages awarded to Mr Gulliver and his most senior colleagues.

This will include pension contributions as well as salary, annual bonus and a long-term share award that has been allotted to him this year. It is designed to show compliance with new Government rules that will come into force later this year, which have been spearheaded by Vince Cable, the Business Secretary.

Douglas Flint, the chairman, Sir Simon Robertson, the deputy chairman, and John Thornton, the non-executive director who chairs the remuneration committee, are understood to have orchestrated the switch to the new disclosure regime ahead of the Government deadline.

For 2011, Mr Gulliver was awarded an annual bonus of just over £2.1m, alongside his base salary of £1.25m and £3.75m in long-term share awards, making a total of £7.2m.

In 2012, his bonus and LTIP are understood to have been determined "in broadly the same ballpark" with a total package worth between £6m and £7m, one person close to the bank said.

HSBC has been applauded by many leading City shareholders for the way it details its executive pay policies through the publication of a 'scorecard' for Mr Gulliver, who took over in 2011.

The chief executive is eligible for an annual bonus of three times his salary and six times his base pay in long-term incentive awards.

A chunk of both payments is determined by HSBC's compliance success and the bank's reputation during a 12-month period. Mr Gulliver is understood to have been awarded nothing in this bracket in 2012, the same outcome as a year earlier, when HSBC was fined for mis-selling bonds to elderly customers.

HSBC suffered one of the most ignominious episodes in its history last year, when it was forced to pay £1.2bn to US regulators to settle money laundering and sanctions breaches which had allowed its Mexican operation to be used by drug cartels and terrorist organisations.

In January, the bank established a committee to bolster its defences against financial crime, recruiting the former heads of HM Revenue and Customs and the Serious Organised Crime Agency, as well as a former US deputy attorney-general.

HSBC will set out plans on Monday to claw back millions of pounds from senior executives deemed to have been culpable in the Mexican situation.

While the bank will not name the affected individuals, they include Sandy Flockhart, the former head of the bank's Asian operation, who was at one stage seen as a contender against Mr Gulliver for the top job.

Mr Flockhart, who left HSBC last year, ran its Mexican subsidiary between 2002 and 2007, and had several million pounds-worth of shares which he is understood to have been told he will not now receive.

I understand, however, that Lord Green, the trade minister who stepped down as HSBC chairman in 2010, will not be included in the clawback effort, partly because he opted to take his long-term pay awards as pension contributions.

Michael Geoghegan, Mr Gulliver's predecessor as chief executive, has also been excluded from the clawback arrangement because the bank's remuneration committee did not conclude that he had been personally responsible for the compliance failings.

The effort to demonstrate pay restraint will be reflected in a lower bonus pool than the £2.8bn that was paid out for 2011, less than a quarter of which was paid to UK employees. HSBC will say on Monday that there has been an across-the-board reduction in the payout pot because of the US fine, although it is still understood to be paying out roughly £2bn in bonuses to staff around the world.

HSBC is also expected to pay a healthy final dividend, with its payouts to shareholders an increasingly-important source of income to UK investors in the context of a banking sector which has seen dividend expenditure shrink dramatically since the financial crisis.

In the UK, HSBC has abandoned a structure for paying staff that saw it impose a £50,000 cap on cash bonuses last year. The scheme involved the bank issuing shares that were then sold immediately in the market to hand executives larger cash sums.

HSBC bosses felt the initiative, devised with the Bank of England and Financial Services Authority, was "cosmetic". Instead, payouts will not include a cash ceiling but larger sums will have to be deferred for several years and won't pay out until employees leave or retire.

Analysts expect HSBC's full-year results to show continued progress under Mr Gulliver at accelerating the pace of change of what had historically been seen as a sluggish supertanker.

He has sold scores of businesses which did not meet internal targets for generating returns and has prioritised growth in the world's fastest-growing economies.

"HSBC has made excellent progress in its strategy to simplify the business and refocus it on growth markets and markets that benefit from international connectivity," analysts at Shore Capital said.

They predict underlying full-year profit of £12.5bn, against £11.8bn in 2011.

HSBC, which declined to comment, is also expected to outline a further provision for compensating customers who were mis-sold payment protection insurance.

12.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

StanChart Cuts Bonuses After £440m Iran Fine

By Mark Kleinman, City Editor

Standard Chartered will this week cut both its group-wide bonus pool and the payout for its chief executive despite a record trading year buoyed by continued economic growth in its core markets.

I understand that London-headquartered Standard Chartered will announce alongside its annual results on Tuesday that it will pay out around $1.4bn (£930m) in bonuses, down from $1.535bn (£1.02bn) last year.

Peter Sands, the bank's chief executive, will see his own award reduced from $3.5m (£2.3m) for 2011 to less than £2m, according to insiders.

Bank chief executive Peter Sands

The reduced payouts will reflect a $667m (£443m) settlement struck late last year between the bank and US regulators over failings in the disclosure of transactions with entities in countries including Iran.

The smaller bonus pool will come despite analysts' expectations that Standard Chartered will announce underlying profits for last year of approximately $7.5bn (£5bn). Including the US fines at a statutory level, earnings are expected to be flat compared to last year's $6.8bn (£4.5bn).

People close to the bank said the bonus reductions were not only an acknowledgement of the Iran episode. They were, they said, also a reflection of demands for banks to hold more capital and for Standard Chartered's board to continue delivering its commitment to a progressive dividend policy.

More detailed disclosure about pay for top executives will not emerge until Standard Chartered's annual report is published next month.

People close to the bank said it would not be able to reclaim past bonuses in relation to the US settlement because the staff involved in the erroneous processing actions were too junior and because the errors took place before clawback was an established feature of bankers' employment contracts.

Standard Chartered, which declined to comment on its bonus plans, is also expected to criticise the deal proposed last week by the European Commission to cap bank bonuses at the level of a year's salary, or two years' with the consent of shareholders.

The rules, which if ratified will come into effect next year, would apply to the global operations of any bank domiciled within the European Union.

Standard Chartered would be at a particular disadvantage from these rules because, although it is based in London, it does little business within the EU. The bank's operations are focused on Asia and Africa, having positioned itself to benefit from the emerging trading blocs of the next few decades.

Mr Sands is thought to be particularly annoyed by the EU proposals after several reviews of Standard Chartered's domicile concluded that the UK continued to offer the most appropriate base for the bank.

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

Pressure On First Buyers As House Prices Rise

By Nick Martin, Sky Correspondent

House prices edged up month-on-month in both January and February this year, bringing good news for homeowners but adding pressure on first-time buyers.

Building society Nationwide said it was cautiously optimistic that activity will pick up in the months ahead.

It comes after reports revealed more young people were living with their parents while trying to save for a deposit for a property. 

According to the Halifax, the average age of a first-time buyer is 30 years old - up from 29 in 2011.

There has been a significant increase in the proportion of first time buyers receiving financial help in recent years.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) estimate that 65% of first time buyers of had financial assistance in mid 2012 compared with 31% in mid-2005.

Kirsty Gilmore, 26, from Bristol, has been living at home for 18 months and has saved more than £30,000. But that is still not enough to buy a property. She says the market is so competitive it is hard to get a good price.

"I want to have my own place, I want to start a family and have a home to call my own, not just my mum and dad's.

"You feel a bit excluded from society - nobody cares and you're stuck in this rut really - and everyone else my age is," she told Sky News.

Mortgage approvals for home buyers have dipped for the first time since a Government scheme to boost lending was launched last August, Bank of England figures showed.

There were 54,719 approvals in January, showing a 2% decline compared with an 11-month high recorded the previous month and marking the first time that there has been a month-on-month decrease since July.

Mortgage approvals for house purchases had been on a steady upward path since the Government's Funding for Lending scheme, which aims to help borrowers by giving lenders access to cheap finance, was launched at the start of August.

The latest figures echo recent findings from the CML, with some analysts blaming the recent bad weather.

Housing minister Mark Prisk said the Government was trying to help first time buyers get onto the property ladder.

"Many people have to rely on the bank of mum and dad - so what we are trying to do with the builders and the Government by putting equity loans forward is make those deposit affordable for first time buyers. It's already helped 17,000 people. We hope it will help 27,000."

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

HSBC Boss Gulliver In Line For £2m Bonus

By Mark Kleinman, City Editor

HSBC is to award its chief executive a bonus of just under £2m for 2012 following a year of successful strategic action to overhaul the bank but which was marred by a £1.2bn fine for violating US money-laundering laws.

I have learned that HSBC, Britain's biggest lender by market capitalisation, will announce on Monday alongside its full-year results that Stuart Gulliver has been awarded the bonus as part of a multimillion pound pay package.

Mr Gulliver intends to accept the award, according to HSBC insiders. His bonus will be deferred and subject to clawback, and he will not be able to cash it in until he retires from or leaves HSBC.

As part of an effort to demonstrate greater transparency over the way it rewards top executives, HSBC will for the first time publish a single figure for the aggregate pay and benefits packages awarded to Mr Gulliver and his most senior colleagues.

This will include pension contributions as well as salary, annual bonus and a long-term share award that has been allotted to him this year. It is designed to show compliance with new Government rules that will come into force later this year, which have been spearheaded by Vince Cable, the Business Secretary.

Douglas Flint, the chairman, Sir Simon Robertson, the deputy chairman, and John Thornton, the non-executive director who chairs the remuneration committee, are understood to have orchestrated the switch to the new disclosure regime ahead of the Government deadline.

For 2011, Mr Gulliver was awarded an annual bonus of just over £2.1m, alongside his base salary of £1.25m and £3.75m in long-term share awards, making a total of £7.2m.

In 2012, his bonus and LTIP are understood to have been determined "in broadly the same ballpark" with a total package worth between £6m and £7m, one person close to the bank said.

HSBC has been applauded by many leading City shareholders for the way it details its executive pay policies through the publication of a 'scorecard' for Mr Gulliver, who took over in 2011.

The chief executive is eligible for an annual bonus of three times his salary and six times his base pay in long-term incentive awards.

A chunk of both payments is determined by HSBC's compliance success and the bank's reputation during a 12-month period. Mr Gulliver is understood to have been awarded nothing in this bracket in 2012, the same outcome as a year earlier, when HSBC was fined for mis-selling bonds to elderly customers.

HSBC suffered one of the most ignominious episodes in its history last year, when it was forced to pay £1.2bn to US regulators to settle money laundering and sanctions breaches which had allowed its Mexican operation to be used by drug cartels and terrorist organisations.

In January, the bank established a committee to bolster its defences against financial crime, recruiting the former heads of HM Revenue and Customs and the Serious Organised Crime Agency, as well as a former US deputy attorney-general.

HSBC will set out plans on Monday to claw back millions of pounds from senior executives deemed to have been culpable in the Mexican situation.

While the bank will not name the affected individuals, they include Sandy Flockhart, the former head of the bank's Asian operation, who was at one stage seen as a contender against Mr Gulliver for the top job.

Mr Flockhart, who left HSBC last year, ran its Mexican subsidiary between 2002 and 2007, and had several million pounds-worth of shares which he is understood to have been told he will not now receive.

I understand, however, that Lord Green, the trade minister who stepped down as HSBC chairman in 2010, will not be included in the clawback effort, partly because he opted to take his long-term pay awards as pension contributions.

Michael Geoghegan, Mr Gulliver's predecessor as chief executive, has also been excluded from the clawback arrangement because the bank's remuneration committee did not conclude that he had been personally responsible for the compliance failings.

The effort to demonstrate pay restraint will be reflected in a lower bonus pool than the £2.8bn that was paid out for 2011, less than a quarter of which was paid to UK employees. HSBC will say on Monday that there has been an across-the-board reduction in the payout pot because of the US fine, although it is still understood to be paying out roughly £2bn in bonuses to staff around the world.

HSBC is also expected to pay a healthy final dividend, with its payouts to shareholders an increasingly-important source of income to UK investors in the context of a banking sector which has seen dividend expenditure shrink dramatically since the financial crisis.

In the UK, HSBC has abandoned a structure for paying staff that saw it impose a £50,000 cap on cash bonuses last year. The scheme involved the bank issuing shares that were then sold immediately in the market to hand executives larger cash sums.

HSBC bosses felt the initiative, devised with the Bank of England and Financial Services Authority, was "cosmetic". Instead, payouts will not include a cash ceiling but larger sums will have to be deferred for several years and won't pay out until employees leave or retire.

Analysts expect HSBC's full-year results to show continued progress under Mr Gulliver at accelerating the pace of change of what had historically been seen as a sluggish supertanker.

He has sold scores of businesses which did not meet internal targets for generating returns and has prioritised growth in the world's fastest-growing economies.

"HSBC has made excellent progress in its strategy to simplify the business and refocus it on growth markets and markets that benefit from international connectivity," analysts at Shore Capital said.

They predict underlying full-year profit of £12.5bn, against £11.8bn in 2011.

HSBC, which declined to comment, is also expected to outline a further provision for compensating customers who were mis-sold payment protection insurance.

12.06 | 0 komentar | Read More